Monday, August 24, 2020

"to reward honor and courage, and to penalize players for casual depravity"

Allow me to simultaneously age myself and pull out my nerd credentials by heartily recommending this article about the early video game Ultima IV, which turns 35 this year:
"It was the fan mail that set Garriott on a path toward reimagining what a computer role-playing game (C.R.P.G.) could do. In these letters, people described how they played the first three Ultimas, which were open-world games that did not require a linear path to complete, giving players the freedom to steal from shops or kill townsfolk. The letter writers explained, according to Garriott, that 'the easiest way to gain power was not to play as a good guy.' He was despondent. 'I inadvertently made games that drove the players to act dishonorably, as this was the path of least resistance.' What if, he wondered, there were a game in which your moral choices had consequences? He wanted the next installment of Ultima to reward honor and courage, and to penalize players for casual depravity. Garriott’s family and colleagues warned him that players might feel as if they were being punished for having admitted to enjoying robbing and murdering, but Garriott ignored them. 'This was the art I was compelled to make,' he said.

Where would these moral ideas come from? Garriott studied Christian theology, Greek philosophy, and Arthurian codes of conduct, but none felt applicable enough for all people. He was attracted to Buddhist and Hindu thought, but these traditions didn’t seem to offer a framework for a game. The plan for Ultima IV coalesced for Garriott after repeatedly watching his favorite movie, 'The Wizard of Oz.' Garriott had been ruminating on the essential ideals of truth, love, and courage and realized that the Scarecrow, Tin Man, and Cowardly Lion, respectively, embodied these concepts. With these three ideals, Garriott created a schema of relational virtues through which a player would develop a hero."

First off, Ultima IV is the first game I remember where you could "talk" to anyone and everyone.  Sure, a lot of the people in the game had little to say beyond "Hello" but no small number of them actually played key roles in your adventure.  You had to interact with them in ways beyond combat or stealing if you wanted to progress within the narrative frame.

Even as an 11 year-old I realized something special was happening here.

Second, I had a friend in high school who wrote an English class paper on the game.  (Or maybe it was the sequel, Ultima V, which covered similar ground?  Or both?)  The English teacher wasn't too thrilled but then again, video games were not taken seriously by anybody back then.  Pac-Man and Space Invaders were what people thought of when you mentioned gaming, not narrative driven quests for spiritual purity and enlightenment.

Third, my mom didn't let me play alone in my room.  We set up "the computer table" near her own work-space.  (At the time she had a typewriter, but not long after she had her own IBM.)  I spent hours there laboring over a Commodore 64, constantly jotting down clues and hints and notes and map locations on a legal yellow pad.  I'd ask my mom for help with turgid Tolkienisms, or run over to the phone to call a friend who was also working on finishing the game and who might have figured out one of its many daunting secrets before I had.

As something resembling "maturity" set in during high school she let it slip that she'd set things up like that on purpose.  She got a kick out of watching me play that damn game, and if it taught me that there's more to life than murdering bad guys and taking their stuff that's secondary to the rest, to her covert tutelage and tacit support of my love for strange adventures.

No comments:

Post a Comment